While the construction of the Rapid Access Monorail would get top priority, the plan also calls for linking in the suburbs using existing freight rail tracks and Diesel Electric Multiple Unit trains - hereafter DEMUs.
These were referred to as "Hybrid Light Rail" cars during the presentation, and although this is technically accurate, nobody else calls 'em that. There was an effort to tie into the strong "Light Rail" branding that still lingers on here in the wake of "T2" Light Rail.
DEMUs are hybrids because they have a small diesel engine and a battery, both of which can power the wheels. And they're light rail because they're lightweight and efficient.
Unfortunately, FRA safety regulations prohibit all reasonably efficient designs from operating concurrently on the same tracks as freight trains. We simply have to change the overly-restrictive FRA regulations. According to Wikipedia, FRA guidelines "greatly restrict the development of [DEMUs] within the U.S. as no other country requires the heavier and less efficient FRA compliant vehicles". FRA over-regulation has made passenger rail prohibitively expensive to operate in the USA, putting people into cars. Cars are 10-100x more deadly than rail. Its a case of over-zealous regulation that has hurt the public good, and somebody - maybe some senators - should put a stop to it. For more on this, I refer you to How the FRA is regulating Passenger Rail out of Existence.
Then there's the little problem that the public doesn't own the freight rail tracks - various railroads companies do. These companies are forced by law to optimize their profit. Human beings are a notoriously impatient, irreplaceable, and litigous cargo to be letting onto your tracks. Think about it: if you have two corn syrup tankers bust into eachother, what happens? $100,000 in damages, no big deal. If you have two passenger cars bump into eachother, people die, $1,000,000,000 of liability, easy. When Daniel Mongiardo says that he'll have to work closely with the railroads to make this happen, he's not joking.
There is wide variance among the railroads on how eager they are to allow passengers on their track. At one extreme, there's CSX, which notoriously squelches almost every intrusion onto its property. At the other end are the community minded smaller railroads, the Paducah and Louisville Railway and R.J. Corman Railroad Group. All of them are willing to 'play ball' with public private partnerships. For example, P&L would probably be persuaded into running passenger rail along Dixie Highway in exchange for getting the aging Muldraugh trestles rebuilt. And CSX might allow passenger rail along Frankfort Avenue if the government were wiling to foot the bill for restoring the double track.
There is another problem with freight rail tracks - the condition of the tracks is in many cases insuffiecent for moving loads at higher speeds. However, this is a problem that can be attacked incrementally over the years. Passenger rail performance would slowly ramp up as capital becomes available.
The presentation did not feature a true system map for Greater Louisville. There was only a slide naming the lines,
Note that these map almost 1-1 into the 8 "advanced transit corridors" TARC ruminates about. Additionally, this quixotic rail map of Old Louisville and Downtown was presented, but it doesn't show whether or not you'll be in a short walk of a rail station. But based on the existing tracks, they probably meant a system map something like this:
View The Mongiardo Transit Plan for Louisville in a larger map
So when you map this out, many questions arise. Please assume they are the fault of my own shoddy transcription of the plan from hearing the presentation.
A number of obstacles need to be overcome in order to build this system:
These are high hurdles and will require a lot of work to surmount.
Comments
Rail map
In regards to using existing freight railroad rights of way and abandoned rights of way
For all the folks who don't remember of never met some of the old old timers who remember things long gone I would add comment.
Leslie Shively , John Hartline and myself along with George Yater and Jim Calvert did acessments of abandoned rights of way and existing rail right of way during the early 1990.s at that time here are a few things we learned. and discussed
The following is left of the old interurban system :
Intact : the Southern Indiana Railway right of way from watson to Speed Indiana - this is al that remains of the once mighty Indiana Railroad interurban. We got permission and rode the switcher on that line with cameras in hand.
Louisvillle and Interurban Prospect line rigt of way in place 95 percent of the way obstructions I 71 crosses right of way would have to tunnell under it to reuse and the bridge is gone and a house blocks it at Harrods Creek. east of Zorn Avenue
Louisville and Eastern Railway LaGrange line is escentaly intact from Whipps Mill Road to Lagrange. west of Whipps Mill it is totaly gone with several subdivisons now in its path
Louisville Railway Co 3rd park line private righ tof way area still in place from Gheens avenue southward to Kenwood Loop
Louisville Railway Co 7th Park line right of wy exists in some parts along Taylor Blvd and tracks are still visable at several locations
Abandoned Rail roght of way former K&IT running from Park Duvalle to 15th street is still there
Former IC Spur from 14th street to 7th street still there
Former Pennsylvania Route from Jeffersonville to New Albany right of way still there could be connected to abandoned B&O r of way near Emory Crossing road to allow a route from Louisville to River Fals Mall Area
Fprmer B&O Jeffersonville Branch riht of way intect to junction with former main line from New Albany just east of Watson Jct. could be connected at old NYC Yard at Dutch lane with old big Four right of way and an existing spur track of the Louisville and Indiana Railway mainline to Louisville.
Former Interurban line to Indianapolis right of way owned by Indiana Public service is unobstructed from speed Indiana to Seymour some is now a walking trail between Scottsburg and Austin Indiana
these are just a few of many.
john owen KIRA
flawed from the start...
my first observation is the lack of a bardstown rd option. from a monetary view, wouldn't it be wise to cash in on the drinkers who travel from pub to club and if they had the option to travel between the "strips" of bardstown and frankfort to downtown and back, safely not driving (something i thoroughly enjoyed while living in chicago)? also isn't there a very large customer base existing in the highlands? installing a single rail line serving the corridor as opposed to the many bus lines that make the run would free a good number of existing routes to service other areas. thought like this needs to be implemented when designing the routes to optimize the revenue and ridership, and minimize competition for existing rail routes.
Well...
I don't think failure to provide rail transit to drunks dooms the plan - I like my fellow passengers sober, personally. Yes, Bardstown Road is a big corridor. Yes, it would be nice to get high quality transit there. No, it doesn't have to come first.
First Attempt at Transit Planning
Not bad, if I do say so myself as a transit planner with 30 years of experience.
Michael D. Setty
www.transportationinnovators.com