We're gonna FIGHT for our RIGHT to WAAAAALK!

Last night, the Lexington City Council approved a controversial plan to build sidewalks along a portion of Tates Creek Road. Most folks weren't sure which way the vote was going to go.

From a Herald-Leader article before the vote: "Sidewalk plan upsets residents:"

Council member Julian Beard, whose district includes the west side of Tates Creek, and Cheryl Feigel, whose district is on the east side, are opposed to the sidewalks. Beard doesn't think people will use them. "My constituents don't see people walking along the road," Beard said, adding that when he drives along Tates Creek, "I never, I mean never, have seen anyone walking."

Supporters of the sidewalk have pointed out that there is a goat trail worn into the grass on the side of the road which drivers probably don't see when they are whizzing by at 45 miles per hour or more.

A group of Tates Creek Road residents was fighting the project tooth and nail, and even hired a lawyer to produce this filled-with-legalese letter which was sent to Lexington's Mayor. The residents also created signs they places on their lawns, stating "No impervious sidewalks" and "Keep Tates Creek Green." A supporter of the sidewalk dryly commented that these same residents weren't too concerned about impervious surfaces when the road was widened several years back.

Supporters of the sidewalk plan organized a "Walk in for Sidewalks." There's a video you can see here. Someone with an eye for PR must have been involved, because they included lots of kids, even one using crutches to navigate the uneven terrain on the side of the road. Nice touch!

 

 

Comments

Nice

Great find, Soosh.

Why do things never get this contentious in Louisville? I wasn't here for the sidewalking of Rudy Lane, but my understanding is it was not this bad.

And now that that battle has been won, and Rudy Lane has not, in fact, become a clear-cut moonscape with shady characters using the sidewalks as transportation to and from crimes, we can always point to it as an example of foolish NIMBY-ism worrying about the wrong problems. Every community should build a high-profile sidewalk every year or two, so that these anti-walking attitudes don't ingrain themselves in the community zeitgeist. Its easier in the long run.

SLC's take

[crossposted from the WALK - CARTKY mailing list, SLC writes]

Score one for sanity in Lexington, which also voted a few years ago for a
tax increase to improve its transit services.  See the related letters to
the Lexington Herald Leader (http://www.kentucky.com/595/story/826679.html),
the first of which was written by my best friend of 39 years.  :-)